Heads up for the time-poor
Rules for 08, 09 and 118 services are changing under the banner “UK Calling”
From July 1st 2015 marketing must ‘prominently display’ the cost of the call broken down into its two constituent parts 1. the service charge and 2. the access charge
If you advertise chargeable service/help line telephone number(s) you must act by July 1st!
and the detail?
Following lengthy consultation, going back years, OFCOM have finally set a date for new rules on call cost transparency.
From July 1st, the cost to the consumer of calling a service number (starting 084, 087, 09 or 118) will be made up of two clear parts:
1. An access charge. This goes to the caller’s telephone company, charged as pence per minute.
2. A service charge. This is the remainder; it includes any revenue going to the service provider (that is you, the party being called), as well as revenue going to the ‘terminating call provider’ (or TCP: the company that provides the number to you).
Marketers must ensure that your service charge is clearly displayed wherever you advertise or promote that number. The service charge should be prominent and in close proximity to the number itself. The recommended form of wording is:
“Calls cost xp [or xp per minute] plus your phone company’s access charge.”
Where can I get more information?
The OFCCOM dedicated UK Calling website at www.ukcalling.info has a dedicated ‘Business’ section which tells you how to set out the required information.
OFCOM 2014 press release here
OFCOM’s 265 page 2012 report, not for the faint-hearted here
I read this morning that hacktivist group Anonymous, under its Operation Italy(#OpItaly) banner claims to have stolen 1TB of data, including unencrypted passwords, from Italy’s Expo 2015 ticket provider Best Union. Are we surprised? No. Did it matter how strong each password was? No. No because they are out ‘in the wild’ along with other personal data. Perhaps […]
What Happened This week the ICO has fined the Welsh Police for losing a video recording which formed part of the evidence in a sexual abuse case. Despite the DVDs containing a graphic and disturbing account, the discs were unencrypted and left in a desk drawer. South Wales Police had no specific force-wide policy in place to […]
Shock Headline! Telecoms Company sued for $750 million for invasion of privacy for Online Behavioural Advertising Reality Check It’s true. It’s a Canadian lawsuit. Nothing has been decided or ruled upon yet. It is complex and it’s not just about OBA, cookies and advertising. But.. As with the recent Vidal-Hall Vs Google case, there’s clearly a growing sentiment […]
A Court of Appeal ruling paves the way for significant civil claims to be bought in the event of misuse of personal data i.e. breach of the Data Protection Act 1998. Summary for the time poor! Google collects personal information via Safari browser (Browser Generated Information or BGI) without the consent or knowledge of claimants. Google […]